Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.rights.licensehttps://www.hbz-nrw.de/produkte/open-access/lizenzen/dppl/dppl/DPPL_v2_de_06-2004
dc.contributor.authorBecker, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-30T07:43:36Z
dc.date.available2021-04-30T07:43:36Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn2197-6910
dc.identifier.urihttp://genderopen.de/25595/1149
dc.description.abstractThis article argues that early modern political thinkers did not think about "success“ and "failure“ in modern terms of material well-being or as results of individual action and self-actualisation. Focusing on the thought of Niccolò Machiavelli and Jean Bodin, two key thinkers of the early modern period, the article shows that two aspects were central to early modern thinkers but that tend to be disregarded in modern debates. Early modern thinkers put considerably more emphasis on the role of fortune, the unruly force which controling human actions, human success and human failure. And they emphasised the central role of the common good as the benchmark against which success needed to be measured.
dc.language.isoger
dc.subjectPolitik
dc.subjectTheorie
dc.subject.ddc320 Politikwissenschaft
dc.subject.otherErfolg
dc.subject.otherScheitern
dc.subject.otherRenaissance
dc.subject.otherVormoderne
dc.titleFortuna oder die Umstände von Erfolg und Scheitern in der politischen Theorie der Vormoderne
dc.typearticle
dc.source.pageinfo42–50
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.journalFKW : Zeitschrift für Geschlechterforschung und visuelle Kultur
dc.source.issue60
local.typeZeitschriftenaufsatz


Dateien in dieser Publikation

Thumbnail

Diese Publikation erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige